<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShopGemstones Blog &#187; pendants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shopgemstones.com/blog/tag/pendants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shopgemstones.com/blog</link>
	<description>Shiny Gemstones.  Brilliant Shoppers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How much is design worth?</title>
		<link>http://www.shopgemstones.com/blog/how-much-is-design-worth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shopgemstones.com/blog/how-much-is-design-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[chrysoprase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gemstones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiffany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shopgemstones.com/blog/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a persistant debate in the jewelry world over style vs substance.  Here at shopgemstones.com, we love the substance: the value of rare gems endures (fluctuates, but endures) while the trends in design do not.  However, some design houses and jewelry creators also endure: an example is Tiffany.  Tiffany was popular before tanzanite, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a persistant debate in the jewelry world over style vs substance.  Here at shopgemstones.com, we love the substance: the value of rare gems endures (fluctuates, but endures) while the trends in design do not.  However, some design houses and jewelry creators also endure: an example is Tiffany.  Tiffany was popular before tanzanite, and a vintage Tiffany design adds a definite premium to the value of a peice of jewelry.  But there&#8217;s a limit, right?</p>
<p>I recently spotted this lovely, beautifully designed <a href="http://www.tiffany.com/Shopping/Item.aspx?sku=23051915&amp;mcat=148204&amp;cid=287465&amp;search_params=s+5-p+4-c+287465-r+101323357-x+-n+6-ri+-ni+0-t+">pendant</a> on Tiffany.com.  It is a peice of carved chrysoprase (good, but not outstanding color) on a silk cord for $975.</p>
<p>Compare this to another c<a href="http://www.heatherdidit.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&amp;cPath=1&amp;products_id=131&amp;zenid=070839c74bd5bf86adf1c1a8de633133">hrysoprase bead on a silk cord</a>, made by &#8220;Heather&#8221;, not Tiffany. Hers costs $48.</p>
<p>Or, you can make your own with this <a href="http://www.beadsonsale.com/australianchrysoprasecarvedfishpendant.aspx">chrysoprase bead</a>, also carved, also a fish for 9.98.</p>
<p>Of course, excellent design deserves a premium, but how much?   If Tiffany&#8217;s carved chrysoprase were $10,000 would it still be acceptable?</p>
<p>There is a saying that the worth of a thing is what someone will pay for it.  So those that buy the Tiffany chrysoprase pendant make it worth $975.</p>
<p>Jewelry and precious gemstones are not commodities: we buy them and wear them for emotional and esthetic reasons.  I guess it comes down to this: for some, having bought it at Tiffany&#8217;s gives an emotional benefit that is worth the extra $950 on the price of the pendant.  For others, the joy of the chrysoprase is enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shopgemstones.com/blog/how-much-is-design-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
